10 Types of Information Sought in Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas - Medicare RAC Audits & Appeals Services
WSJ logo
Forbes logo
Fox News logo
Bloomberg logo
Los Angeles Times logo
Washington Post logo
The Epoch Times logo
CNN logo
Telemundo logo
New York Times
NY Post logo
NBC logo
Daily Beast logo
USA Today logo
Miami Herald logo
CNBC logo
Dallas News logo
Quick Practice Area Locator

10 Types of Information Sought in Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas

The U.S. Attorney’s Office has broad authority to compel testimony and the production of records through the issuance of federal grand jury subpoenas. Federal grand jury subpoenas ad testifacandum (requiring testimony) and federal grand jury subpoenas duces tecum (requiring document production) can be extraordinarily broad, and they generally are not subject to prior judicial approval.

The breadth and generality of federal grand jury subpoenas means that determining what information the recipient is required to disclose can be a challenge. However, extreme care must be taken to ensure that the information disclosed is no more voluminous than absolutely necessary. This requires a critical assessment of the language of the subpoena, appropriate legal action to limit the scope of the subpoena, and meticulous preparation of the testimony and documents to be provided.

10 Types of Evidence in Federal Grand Jury Proceedings

When preparing a federal grand jury subpoena response, it is also helpful to have a general understanding of the types of information and records that are subject to disclosure. Some of the most-common types of evidence sought in federal grand jury subpoenas include:

1. Incriminating Testimony

If you or your company is the target of the government’s investigation, then the Assistant U.S. Attorneys prosecuting your case may be hoping to use your own words against you. As a result, upon receiving a federal grand jury subpoena, one of the first steps you need to take is to determine your role in the government’s investigation. If you or your company is being targeted, then you will need to focus your preparation efforts on anticipating potentially-dangerous questions and making sure you know how to respond without exposing yourself to federal prosecution.

In order to determine your role in the investigation, you will need to engage federal defense counsel to intervene in the investigation and interface with the U.S. Attorney’s Office on your behalf. You will also need to begin working with your defense counsel immediately in order to prepare your grand jury testimony.

2. Information Against Co-Conspirators

Federal criminal investigations often target multiple individuals who are alleged to be co-conspirators involved in a criminal enterprise. Drug crime investigations, healthcare fraud investigations, and other types of white-collar criminal investigations all frequently involve allegations of conspiracy. Federal prosecutors routinely question alleged co-conspirators in order to piece together evidence of criminal conduct, identify inconsistencies and false statements, and obtain sworn statements implicating co-conspirators in federal crimes.

3. Emails, Texts, Other Communications

Emails, text messages, voicemails, memoranda, and other forms of communication will often be key pieces of evidence in federal white-collar criminal investigations as well. Federal grand jury subpoenas duces tecum will often include general requests for all communications with particular individuals or pertaining to particular aspects of the government’s investigation.

For businesses, upon receiving a subpoena duces tecum, it is important to promptly institute a “legal hold” in order to ensure that no responsive records of communications are destroyed. For individuals subpoenaed in their personal capacity and as corporate records custodians, it is critical to ensure production of all responsive communications (subject to any relevant objections or privilege assertions). Not only is it possible that the individuals on the other end of these communications are being subpoenaed as well; but, withholding responsive documents can lead to contempt charges and other adverse consequences regardless of the veracity of the substantive allegations underlying the government’s investigation.

4. Hearsay

Hearsay evidence is admissible in federal grand jury proceedings. As summarized by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), “As a general rule, it is proper to present hearsay to the grand jury. . . . Each United States Attorney should be assured that hearsay evidence presented to the grand jury will be presented on its merits so that the jurors are not misled into believing that the witness is giving his or her personal account.” While excessive reliance on hearsay or failure to disclose the nature of hearsay can trigger Fifth Amendment due process concerns, the use of hearsay evidence in itself does not constitute grounds to seek dismissal of a federal grand jury indictment.

5. Financial Records

During federal grand jury proceedings, the U.S. Attorney’s Office can subpoena financial records from the targets of the government’s investigation as well as from the banks where they deposit their funds. Under federal jurisprudence, “[a] bank depositor lacks the necessary Fourth Amendment interest to challenge a subpoena duces tecum issued to a bank for its records of the depositor’s transactions.”

Federal prosecutors can use financial records for a variety of different purposes. From establishing financial relationships between alleged co-conspirators to proving allegations of money laundering and bank fraud, financial records will play a central role in many types of federal criminal investigations.

6. Business Records

In addition to stored communications and financial records, the U.S. Attorney’s Office can use federal grand jury subpoenas duces tecum to obtain virtually all other types of business records. This can range from billing records and patient records in federal healthcare fraud investigations to employment records in investigations targeting companies accused of unlawfully hiring undocumented workers. Once again, upon receiving a subpoena duces tecum, efforts must be undertaken swiftly to preserve all potentially-responsive records, and records custodians must work closely with company leadership and outside defense counsel to ensure compliant production.

Put our highly experienced team on your side

Dr. Nick Oberheiden
Dr. Nick Oberheiden



Lynette S. Byrd
Lynette S. Byrd

Former DOJ Trial Attorney


Brian J. Kuester
Brian J. Kuester

Former U.S. Attorney

Amanda Marshall
Amanda Marshall

Former U.S. Attorney

Local Counsel

Joe Brown
Joe Brown

Former U.S. Attorney

Local Counsel

John W. Sellers
John W. Sellers

Former Senior DOJ Trial Attorney

Linda Julin McNamara
Linda Julin McNamara

Federal Appeals Attorney

Aaron L. Wiley
Aaron L. Wiley

Former DOJ attorney

Local Counsel

Roger Bach
Roger Bach

Former Special Agent (DOJ)

Chris Quick
Chris J. Quick

Former Special Agent (FBI & IRS-CI)

Michael S. Koslow
Michael S. Koslow

Former Supervisory Special Agent (DOD-OIG)

Ray Yuen
Ray Yuen

Former Supervisory Special Agent (FBI)

7. Agreements with Other Commercial Parties or Customers

Agreements with other commercial parties, patients, clients, and customers will also commonly fall within the scope of federal grand jury subpoenas duces tecum. Federal prosecutors will often use contracts to prove different individuals’ and companies’ roles in conspiracies, to prove Anti-Kickback Statute violations and other similar types of offenses, and to prove offenses ranging from Medicare fraud to investment fraud and consumer protection violations.

8. Record Retention Policies

In addition to requesting other types of business records, federal prosecutors may also request corporate entities’ record retention policies so that they can determine if and when potentially-relevant records may have been destroyed. This includes automated and regularly-scheduled deletion of electronic files both prior and subsequent to the issuance of the subpoena.

9. Other Internal Policies and Procedures

Depending on the nature of the government’s investigation, a federal grand jury subpoena duces tecum may request other types of internal policies and procedures as well. Requests for Medicare, Medicaid, and Tricare compliance policies; client management and communication policies; employment policies; background check procedures; and, other types of policies and procedures are all common.

10. Information Leading to Other Sources of Evidence

Within federal grand jury subpoenas duces tecum and during questioning in front of the grand jury, federal prosecutors may also seek information that will lead them to other sources of evidence. While conducting a “fishing expedition” is not permitted, the U.S. Attorney’s Office can use a variety of types of document requests and questioning tactics to gain insights even if the documents produced or the testimony provided do not themselves constitute evidence of guilt.

What Information are You Required to Disclose?

Importantly, while the subpoena power afforded to the U.S. Attorney’s Office is substantial, it is not absolute. Targets of federal investigations and witnesses subpoenaed to testify or produce records are entitled to challenge federal grand jury subpoenas and potentially withhold information on grounds including (but not limited to):

  • Vague, indefinite, unduly burdensome, or oppressive demands – The burdens of responding to a federal grand jury subpoena can be substantial; and, in some cases, they can be insurmountable. If it is not feasible to comply with a subpoena, whether because the requests are not clear or because it practically impossible to compile the volume of records requested, the recipient may have grounds to challenge the subpoena in court.
  • The information sought is irrelevant to the government’s investigation – If some or all of the information sought is not relevant to the government’s investigation, this can provide grounds to challenge the subpoena as well.
  • Assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination – It is permissible for individuals to assert their Fifth Amendment privilege when called to testify before a grand jury. Individuals can also assert the Fifth Amendment to avoid producing records if the act of production itself would be self-incriminating. However, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination does not extent to business entities, nor does it protect the contents of subpoenaed records.
  • Assertion of the attorneyclient privilege – The attorney-client privilege provides critical protection for individuals and businesses in federal grand jury proceedings. When responding to a federal grand jury subpoena ad testifacandum or a federal grand jury subpoenas duces tecum, it is absolutely essential to ensure that the attorney-client privilege remains preserved.

Discuss Your Grand Jury Subpoena with a Federal Defense Lawyer in Confidence

If you or your company’s records custodian has been served with a federal grand jury subpoena, it is important that you speak with a federal defense lawyer as soon as possible. To schedule a free and confidential case assessment with an attorney at Oberheiden, P.C., please call 888-680-1745 or tell us how to reach you online now.

Subpoena Resources

Why Clients Trust Oberheiden P.C.

  • 95% Success Rate
  • 2,000+ Cases Won
  • Available Nights & Weekends
  • Experienced Trial Attorneys
  • Former Department of Justice Trial Attorneys
  • Former Federal Prosecutors, U.S. Attorney’s Office
  • Former Agents from FBI, OIG, DEA
  • Cases Handled in 48 States
Email Us 888-680-1745