PGX Testing Fraud Defense Attorneys - Oberheiden, P.C.
WSJ logo
Forbes logo
Fox News logo
Bloomberg logo
Los Angeles Times logo
Washington Post logo
The Epoch Times logo
CNN logo
Telemundo logo
New York Times
NY Post logo
NBC logo
Daily Beast logo
USA Today logo
Miami Herald logo
CNBC logo
Dallas News logo
Quick Practice Area Locator

Defending Toxicology Laboratories in PGX Testing Fraud Cases

Toxicology Laboratories investigation

What Is PGX Testing?

PGX testing is an emerging medical technology within the field of clinical laboratories that uses a patient’s DNA to predict how that patient will react to medication.  Doctors can use PGX testing to tailor treatment regimens for individual patients as well as to prevent a patient experiencing a bad reaction to a particular medication.  PGX testing is commonly used to determine a patient’s tolerance to narcotic pain medication as well as to address cancer treatments.

What Is PGX Testing Fraud?

PGX testing fraud occurs when a healthcare program is improperly billed for PGX testing.  For example, while Medicare does cover PGX testing for patients with a diagnosed disease or ailment, Medicare does not cover PGX testing when it is used merely for pre-symptomatic screening purposes.  Therefore, laboratories that bill Medicare for PGX screening tests may be violation of the False Claims Act.  Additionally, laboratories that pay kickbacks to physicians for PGX testing referrals may violate the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.  Laboratories may also run afoul of the Stark Law and False Claims Act if they have a financial relationship with any of the physicians who refer patient samples to them.

What Penalties Do Laboratories Face for PGX Testing Fraud?

PGX testing fraud is punishable under the same statutes as most other healthcare fraud – the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq.), the healthcare fraud statute (18 U.S.C. § 1347), the Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b), and the Stark Law (42 U.S.C. § 1395nn).  Each of the aforementioned statutes provide civil penalties for violation, including civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, and exclusion from federal programs.  Additionally, the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute and the healthcare fraud statute provide criminal penalties, including criminal charges, indictments, prison sentences, probation, and criminal fines.  Civil or criminal charges may be brought against both the laboratory itself as well as the individuals owning or operating the laboratory.

Contact Experienced Attorneys

The former federal prosecutors and experienced defense attorneys at Oberheiden, P.C. represent toxicology laboratories, healthcare providers and business owners throughout the United States facing being investigated for violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, alleged Qui Tam Lawsuit, the Stark Law, the False Claims Act, and other healthcare violations.  With an intimate understanding of the healthcare industry and extensive knowledge of healthcare laws, we know what to expect from federal investigators and how best to negotiate with them.  We have a proven track record of helping our clients successfully defeat charges of laboratory fraud.

Put our highly experienced team on your side

Dr. Nick Oberheiden
Dr. Nick Oberheiden

Founder

Attorney-at-Law

Lynette S. Byrd
Lynette S. Byrd

Former DOJ Trial Attorney

Partner

Brian J. Kuester
Brian J. Kuester

Former U.S. Attorney

Amanda Marshall
Amanda Marshall

Former U.S. Attorney

Local Counsel

Joe Brown
Joe Brown

Former U.S. Attorney

Local Counsel

John W. Sellers
John W. Sellers

Former Senior DOJ Trial Attorney

Linda Julin McNamara
Linda Julin McNamara

Federal Appeals Attorney

Aaron L. Wiley
Aaron L. Wiley

Former DOJ attorney

Local Counsel

Roger Bach
Roger Bach

Former Special Agent (DOJ)

Chris Quick
Chris J. Quick

Former Special Agent (FBI & IRS-CI)

Michael S. Koslow
Michael S. Koslow

Former Supervisory Special Agent (DOD-OIG)

Ray Yuen
Ray Yuen

Former Supervisory Special Agent (FBI)

  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (Stark Law Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
  • Toxicology Laboratory (False Claims Act Investigation)
    Result: Case concluded with no liability for our client.
Oberheiden, P.C.
Healthcare Compliance – Litigation – Defense
888-680-1745
www.rac-audit-defense.com
This information has been prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information may constitute attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Reading of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee similar future outcomes. Oberheiden, P.C. is a Texas PC with headquarters in Dallas. Mr. Oberheiden limits his practice to federal law.

Why Clients Trust Oberheiden P.C.

  • 95% Success Rate
  • 2,000+ Cases Won
  • Available Nights & Weekends
  • Experienced Trial Attorneys
  • Former Department of Justice Trial Attorneys
  • Former Federal Prosecutors, U.S. Attorney’s Office
  • Former Agents from FBI, OIG, DEA
  • Cases Handled in 48 States
Email Us 888-680-1745